Microeconomics is more focused on the smaller details while macroeconomics is more focused on the larger aspects of economics. The two are very different in what they are trying to show, but that does not mean they are completely different in the process of doing it.
Microeconomics tries to show why certain economic decisions are better or worse. It may be a better idea than doing macro, because the micro has to be shown how good the macro is in terms of its ability to make those decisions right. This is where the micro comes in, as it tries to show why a decision is bad, not just in the short term but for the long term. It also shows why things tend to go bad with one approach while they tend to go good with another.
This is a much deeper and more detailed way to look at economic decisions. It can be difficult to do, since you are dealing with micro and macro at the same time. But there is some good news though, because microeconomics has a lot of advantages that other methods don't have.
One thing it tends to do that other approaches do not have is showing people how to make better economic decisions. People have been making these economic decisions all along, and they usually get it wrong. However, you can give them a better and easier way to make these choices. In addition, microeconomics is not really concerned with the big picture, since its focus is on the micro. People can see where their mistakes are coming from, which makes it easier to improve on.
Another good thing about microeconomics is that it is much easier to teach. You just need to have a general understanding of economics to be able to work on this part of it. Even if you are working on the big picture, this part should be easy enough to understand. If you have a good grasp of how the macro works, then you can get the basics down pretty easily.
Microeconomics is much easier to learn than macro, so it is a great method for learning the basics of economics. It is a great way to get a feel for all of the different kinds of economies and how they work.
Another advantage of microeconomics is that it helps to show people how to make better macro decisions. Because it is such a short term thing, it is much easier to look at macro in isolation. If a decision is going to affect the macro in a big way, you have to have an understanding of how it will work long term. If a small decision is going to affect it long term, then you can start looking at it from a micro perspective.
Finally, microeconomics tends to be much more abstract than macro. It is much harder to think about the big picture in a short term than macro is. Since the decision is so short term, there is very little room for uncertainty, which means that it is easier to come up with solid decisions, even when it comes to something as important as economic policy.